http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, New York, Washington, the District of Columbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New Jersey even made violation of its law a first offense. But several studies over the years have found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a hand-held device.

A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.

A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers' use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to no one's surprise) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true or false questions. Brain scans of the distracted drivers showed brain activity decreased in areas that process visual and spatial information, functions that are crucial for navigation. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver's focus on the road.

As reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only their hands on the wheel, they also have to keep their brains on the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention of the driver's brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in a demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into Spanish thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, Nueva York, Washington, the Distrito apagado Columbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New Jersey even made violación apagado its law a first ofensa. But several studies over the years have found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a hand-held device.

A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.

A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers' use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to n one' s sorpresa) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true or false questions. BRAIN scans apagado the distracted controles showed BRAIN activity decreased en areas that proceso visual and espacial información, functions that área crucial fuero navegación. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver' s focus on the road.

As reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only their hands on the wheel, they also have to keep their brains on the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention of the driver' s brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in a demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into Italian thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, New York, Washington, the zona lontano Columbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New Jersey even made violazione lontano its law a first offesa. But several studies over the years have found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a hand-held device.

A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.

A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers'use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to no one's surprise) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist marcel just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true or false questions. BRAIN scans lontano the distracted driver showed BRAIN activity decreased in areas that processo visual and spaziale informazione, functions that ara determinante foro navigazione. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver's focus on the road.

As reported in This is London, just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only their hands on the wheel, they also have to keep their brains on the road. Drivers'seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention of the driver's brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in a demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into German thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, New York, Washington, the Distrikt of Columbia and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New - jersey even made violation of its law a first offense. But several studies over the years have found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a hand-held device.

A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the, car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.

A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers' use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to Nr. one' s überraschung) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a, car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true, or false questions. BRAIN scans of the distracted BRAIN-Driver showed activity decreased in areas that visual Prozeß Raumfahrtand Information, functions that entscheidendes Ar Navigationsfor. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver' s focus on the road.

As reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only their hands on the wheel, they also have to keep their brains on the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention of the driver' s brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in a demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into Portuguese thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, Nova Iorque, Washington, the Distrito fora a Colúmbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring drivers to use hands-free devices to make phone calls. New - jersey even made violation of its law a first offense. But several studies over the years have found that talking on a hands-free device is not much safer than talking on a hand-held device.

A study by the American Psychological Association of over 500 drivers found that talking on a cell phone cut activity in areas of the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing on a phone conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects on the road, and had a hard time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the car posed the same hazards as hand-held devices.

A different study by the University of Utah tested drivers' use of hands-free cell phones on the road, and found (to no one' s surprise) that chatty drivers were the main cause of traffic problems. Apparently, drivers talking on a cell phone were less likely to change lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Mellon University questions hands-free laws, and whether their existence only gives drivers a false sense of safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used a driving simulator inside an MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving a car along a virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out of the center of the lane more often when they tried to answer true or false questions. Cérebro scans fora the distracted motoristas showed cérebro activity decreased dentro areas that processamento visual and espacial informação, functions that are crucial for navegação. Once again, this proved that participating in a conversation is all it took to reduce a driver' s focus on the road.

As reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only their hands on the wheel, they also have to keep their brains on the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention of the driver' s brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in a demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may be laws out there that ban the use of hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain a dangerous place as long as drivers continue to carry phone conversations on hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

The truth butt using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into English thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, New York, Washington, the District off Columbia, and Connecticut) cut imposed laws requiring drivers to uses hands-free devices to make phon cal. New Jersey even made violation off its law has first offence. Several studies over the years cuts found that talking one drank has hands-free device is not much safer than talking one has hand-held device.

With study by the American Psychological Association off over 500 drivers found that talking one has concealment phon cut activity in areas off the brain used for driving by half. Drivers focusing there is phon conversation had slower reaction times, were less likely to recall objects one the road, and had has hardware time noticing traffic around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the bus posed the same hazards have hand-held devices.

With different study by the University off Utah tested drivers' hands-free concealment phons off one uses the road, and found (to No one' S surprised) that chatty drivers were the hand causes traffic problems off. Apparently, drivers talking one has concealment phon were less likely to changes lanes, and spent more time following slow fox trot-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Melon University questions hands-free laws, and whether to their only existence gives drivers has off false judicious safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used has driving simulator inside year MRI brain scanner. The volunteers were tasked with driving has bus along has virtual winding road, with and without distractions.

Researchers found that drivers would hit the guardrail and veer out off the center off the lane more often when they tried to answer true gold false questions. Brain scans off the distracted drivers showed brain activity decreased in areas that space process visual and information, functions that crucial are for navigation. Ounce again, this proved that participating in A conversation is Al it took to reduce has driver' S x-ray one the road.

Have reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Drivers need to keep not only to their hands one the wheel, they also cuts to keep to their brains one the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpits and during difficult driving situations they require the undivided attention off the driver' S brain.

The clear implication is that engaging in A demanding conversation could jeopardise judgment and reaction time.
So while there may Be laws out there that round of applause the uses off hand-held phons behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain has dangerous place have long ace drivers continues to curry phon conversations one hands-free devices - so Be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phons

Sanningsändan genom att använda hands-free apparater bak rulla
Automatically translated into Swedish thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

många påstår (inklusive Kalifornien, New York, Washington, området av Columbia och Connecticut) klippta lagda på lagar som kräver chaufförer till hands-free apparater för bruk att göra phonen cal. New Jersey även har den gjorda kränkningen av dess lag den första förseelsen. Flera studier över åren som snitt grundar det som talar en, drack har den hands-free apparaten är inte mycket säkrare, än samtal av en har den hand-held apparaten.

Med studien vid amerikanen som den psykologiska anslutningen över 500 chaufförer grundar av det som talar en, har aktivitet för hemlighållandephonsnitt i områden av hjärnan som används för att köra av halva. Chaufförer som där fokuserar, är phonkonversation hade långsammare reaktionstider, var mindre rimliga att återkalla anmärker en vägen och hade har maskinvarutid att märka för att trafikera runt om dem. Forskare noterade också att hands-free apparater i bussa poserade samma äventyrar har hand-held apparater.

Med den olika studien vid universitetar av Utah testade chaufför hands-free hemlighållandephons av en använder vägen och grundar (till inget ens förvånadt) som chatty chaufförer var räcka orsakar trafikerar problem av. Som synes har chaufförer som talar en, hemlighållandephon var mindre rimliga till ändringslanes och spenderade mer rävtrava-flyttning för tid efter långsamma medel.

Den senaste forskningen vid den Carnegie Melon universitetar ifrågasätter hands-free lagar, och huruvida till deras endast existens ger chaufförer har av falsk omdömesgill säkerhet. För att testa denna teori neuroscientistMarcel har precis utstuderade 29 volontärer, som använde, att köra bildläsaren för hjärnan för året MRI för simulatorn den inre. Volontärerna var tasked med att köra har att bussa along har den faktiska slingriga vägen, med och utan förvirringar.

Forskare grundar att den chaufförer skulle hiten guardrailen och svänger ut av centrera av lanen oftare, då de försökte att svara riktigt guld- falskt ifrågasätter. Hjärnan avläser av de förströdda chaufförerna visade minskad hjärnaktivitet i områden att visuellt hjälpmedel och information om utrymme den processaa, fungerar som avgörande var för navigering. Unset igen, detta bevisade att deltagande i a-konversation är Al som den tog för att förminska har chaufför röntgenstråle en vägen.

Har anmält i detta är London, precis avslutnings:

Chaufförer behöver uppehället inte endast till deras räcker en rulla, dem klipper också till uppehället till deras hjärnor en vägen. Chaufförer placerar i många medel är passande högt instrumenterade cockpit, och under svåra körande lägen kräver de den odelade uppmärksamheten av chaufför hjärna.

Den klara implikationen är att inkoppling i fordra konversation för A kunde äventyra dom- och reaktionstid.
Fördriva så där kan vara lagar ut där som rundan av applåd bruket av hand-held phons bak rulla, sanningen är den ska vägen återstår har farligt förlägga har långa topp- chaufförer fortsätter för att rykta hands-free apparater för phonkonversationer en - var så försiktig ut där.

Anknyta: Köra studieavtalsslaget till hands-free phons

Приклад правды использующ hands-free приспособления за колесом
Automatically translated into Russian thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

много законов положений (включая California, нью-йорк, вашингтон, заречье с Columbia, и Connecticut) отрезанных наведенных требуя, что водители к приспособлениям польз hands-free сделали phon cal. Нарушение Нью-Джерси даже сделанное с своего закона имеет первую обиду. Несколько изучений над отрезоками лет нашли что говорящ одно выпил имеет hands-free приспособление не будет очень безопасно чем говорящ одно имеют hand-held приспособление.

С изучением американской психологической ассоциацией над 500 водителями нашл что говорить один имеет деятельность при отрезока phon укрытия в зонах с мозга используемого для управлять половиной. Водители фокусируя там будут переговором phon имели более медленные времена реакции, были более менее правоподобны для того чтобы вспомнить предметы одно дорога, и имели имеют время оборудования заметить движение вокруг их. Исследователя также заметили что hands-free приспособления в шине представили такие же опасности имеют hand-held приспособления.

С по-разному изучением университетом с водителей испытанных phons укрытия Ютой hands-free с одного использует дорогу, и нашл (к удивленному No one s) что chatty водители были проблемами движения причин руки. Явно, водители говоря одно имеют phon укрытия были более менее правоподобны к майнам изменений, и тратили больше времени следуя за кораблями медленной лисицы идти рысью-двигая.

Самое последнее исследование Carnegie Дыней, котор университет спрашивает hands-free законы, и дает ли к их только существованию водителей имеет с ложной judicious безопасности. Для того чтобы испытать эту теорию, neuroscientist Marcel как раз изучил 29 волонтеров которые использовали имеют управлять имитатором внутри блока развертки мозга года MRI. Волонтеры были tasked с управлять имеют шину вперед имеют фактически дорогу замотки, с и без отвечениями.

Исследователя нашли что водители ударят усовик и лавируют вне с центра с майны более часто когда они попытались ответить вопросы о поистине золота ложные. Мозг просматривает с отвлеканных водителей показал уменьшитую деятельность при мозга в зонах что visual космоса отростчатые и информация, функции которые критическо будьте для навигации. Унция снова, это доказала что участвовать в переговоре a будет Al, котор оно принял для уменьшения имеет рентгеновский снимок одно driver s дорога.

Сообщите в этом будет как раз заключенным лондоном:

Водителям нужно держать not only к их рукам одно колесо, они также режут для того чтобы держать к их мозгам одно дорога. Места водителей в много кораблей будут высоки оборудованными кокпитами и во время трудных управляя ситуаций они требуют undivided внимания с мозга driver s.

Ясная прикосновенность что включать в переговоре a требуя смогл jeopardise время суждения и реакции.
Так пока может быть законов дорога вне там кругло рукоплескания пользы с hand-held phons за колесом, правды останет имеет опасное место иметь длинних водителей туза продолжается к приспособлениям переговоров одного phon curry hands-free - так быть осторожным вне там.

Соединение: Управлять дуновением дел изучения к hands-free phons

The truth about using hands-free devices behind the wheel
Automatically translated into Dutch thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

Many states (including California, New York, Washington, the District off Columbia, and Connecticut) have imposed laws requiring driver to gebruiken hands-free devices to make phone calls. New - jersey even made overtreding off its law aan first belediging. Doel several studies over the years have found that talking men hebben hands-free device is not much safer than talking men hebben hand-held device.

AAN study by the American Psychological Vereniging off over 500 driver found that talking men hebben cell phone cut activity in areas off the brain used for driving by half. Driver focusing men hebben phone gesprek had slower reactie times, were less likely to recall objects men the road, and had hebben hard time noticing handel around them. Researchers also noted that hands-free devices in the want posed the same hazards aas hand-held devices.

A verschillend study by the University off Utah tested drivers' gebruiken off hands-free cell phones men the road, and found (to no one' s verrassen) that chatty driver were the hand veroorzaken off handel problems. Apparently, driver talking men hebben cell phone were less likely to veranderen lanes, and spent more time following slow-moving vehicles.

The latest research by Carnegie Meloen University vraag hands-free laws, and whether their bestaan only gives driver hebben false redelijk off safety. To test this theory, neuroscientist Marcel Just studied 29 volunteers who used aan driving simulator inside jaar MRI brain scannen. The volunteers were tasked with driving hebben want along hebben virtual winding road, with and without onachtzaamheid.

Researchers found that driver would hit the guardrail and veer out off the center off the lane more often when they tried to answer true echter false vraag. Brain scans off the distracted drivers showed brain activity decreased in areas that visual process ruimteand informatie, functions that fundamentele are for scheepvaart. Once again, this proved that participating in hebben gesprek is DE IT took to reduce aan driver' s brandpunt men the road.

Aas reported in This is London, Just concluded:

Driver need to keep not only their hands men the wheel, they also have to keep their brains men the road. Drivers' seats in many vehicles are becoming highly instrumented cockpit and during difficult driving situatie they require the undivided aandacht off the driver' s brain.

The clear gevolg is that engaging in aan demanding gesprek could jeopardise judgment and reactie time.
So while there may be laws out there that afkondiging the gebruiken off hand-held phones behind the wheel, the truth is the road will remain aan dangerous plaatsen aas lang aas driver door:gaan to carry phone gesprek men hands-free devices - so be careful out there.

Link: Driving study deals blow to hands-free phones

الحقيقة طرف يستعمل أدوات [هندس-فر] خلف العجلة
Automatically translated into Arabic thanks to WorldLingo

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/hughes/24247

كثير دول ([إينكلودينغ] كاليفورنيا, نيويورك, واشنطن, المنطقة من كولومبيا, وكونكتكت) يقطع يفرض قانون يتطلّب سائقات إلى إستعمالات أدوات [هندس-فر] أن يجعل فوه [كل]. [نو-جرسي] حتّى يتلقّى يجعل انتهاك من قانونه مخالفات أولى. أسّس عدّة دراسات على السنون قطعات أنّ يتحدّث واحدة شرب يتلقّى أداة [هندس-فر] ليس كثير آمنة من يتحدّث واحدة يتلقّى أداة [هند-هلد].

أسّس مع دراسة بالجمعية أمريكيّة نفسانيّة باتّجاه آخر على 500 سائقات أنّ يتحدّث واحدة يتلقّى تستر فوت قطعة نشاط في مناطق من الدماغ يستعمل ل يقود بنصف. سائقات [فوكسنغ] هناك فول محادثة تلقّى [ركأيشن تيم] بطيئة, كان أقلّ مرجّحة أن يتذكّر أشياء واحدة الطريق, ويتلقّى جهاز وقت يلاحظ حركة مرور حول هم. لاحظ باحثات أيضا أنّ أدوات [هندس-فر] في الحافلة طرحوا ال نفسه أخطار يتلقّى أدوات [هند-هلد].

يستعمل مع دراسة مختلفة بالجامعة من أوتاه يختبر سائقات [هندس-فر] تستر فول من واحدة الطريق, وأسّس (إلى [نو ون'] [س] يفاجأ) أنّ سائقات هاذرة كانوا اليد أسباب حركة مرور مشاكل باتّجاه آخر. ظاهريّا, يتلقّى سائقات يتحدّث واحدة تستر فول كان أقلّ مرجّحة إلى تغيرات دروب, وأنفق كثير وقت يتبع ثعلب بطيئة [تروت-موفينغ] عربات.

يعطي البحث متأخّرة ب [كرنج] [ملون] جامعة يستنطق قانون [هندس-فر], وما إذا إلى هم فقط وجود سائقات يتلقّى من أمان زائفة حكيمة. أن يختبر هذا نظرية, درس عالم أعصاب مارسيل فقط 29 متطوعات الذي استعمل يتلقّى يقود محاكية في سنة [مري] دماغ ماسحة. كان المتطوعات أرهق مع يقود يتلقّى حافلة جانبا يتلقّى فعليّة لفيفة طريق, مع ودون إلتهاء.

باحثات أسّسوا أنّ ضرب سائقات الدرابزون وانحرف خارجا من المركز من الدرب أكثر غالبا عندما هم حاولوا أن يجيب يصحّ نوع ذهب أسئلة زائفة. دماغ يمسح من ال يلهى سائقات أبدى دماغ نشاط ينخفض في مناطق أنّ فراغ معامل صورة ومعلومة, أعمال أنّ حاسمة كنت لملاحة. برهن أونصة ثانية, هذا أنّ يساهم في [ا] محادثة [أل] هو أخذ أن يقلّد يتلقّى [دريفر'] [س] أشعّة سينيّة واحدة الطريق.

قد أفاد في هذا لندن, فقط يستنتج:

سائقات يحتاجون أن يحافظ ليس فحسب إلى أياديهم واحدة العجلة, هم أيضا يقطع أن يحافظ إلى أدمغتهم واحدة الطريق. سائقات يصبح مقاعد في كثير عربات جدّا يؤلّف حجرة رادار وأثناء يصعب يقود حالات هم يتطلّبون الإنتباه [أونديفيدد] من ال [دريفر'] [س] دماغ.

التضمن واضحة أنّ يشبك في [ا] يطلب محادثة استطاع عرضت حكم و [ركأيشن تيم].
هكذا بينما هناك يمكن كنت قانون خارجا هناك أنّ مستديرة من تصفيق الإستعمالات من فون [هند-هلد] خلف العجلة, الحقيقة يكونون سيبقى الطريق يتلقّى مكان خطرة يتلقّى طويلة بطلة سائقات يستمرّ إلى كاري فون محادثات واحدة أدوات [هندس-فر] - هكذا حريصة خارجا هناك.

خطوة: يقود دراسة صفقات ضرب إلى فوت [هندس-فر]